The decision comes after jurors in the federal Eastern District of Texas found in favour of ams-TAOS on all claims against Intersil for misappropriation of ams-TAOS’ trade secrets and breach of a non-disclosure agreement between the parties.
The also found that that there was “interference with ams-TAOS’ prospective business relations” and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,596,981.
The company’s General Counsel Jann H. Siefken stated:
“We are pleased with the court’s decision to enforce our company’s intellectual property rights against a competitor who would seek to misappropriate them for an unfair competitive advantage.”
The final judgement can be appealed and so ams said it was not able to estimate a time frame for conclusion of the case or recovery of damages awarded.
The case is Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions Inc. v. Intersil Corp., No. 4:08-cv-451. The company ams AG is represented by the Dallas, Texas law firm Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP.
See also: Power chip start-up benefits from specialist ams foundry
See also: Chip puts active noise cancellation into bundled headphones